Worldwide Ron Paul Campaigns Meetup Message Board › Must Dr. Paul capitulate to our Jewish masters' demands?

Must Dr. Paul capitulate to our Jewish masters' demands?

A former member
Posted Oct 26, 2007 9:42 AM
Post #: 532
Must he personally repudiate any support from those advocating for majority interests -- those so-called "toxic neo-Nazis" -- and give any money received from them to Holocaust museums?

Where does it end? Is it being demanded that he personally repudiate any others, like queers, and give any money received from them to that preacher with the "God Hates Fags" church?

These are the same folks who control Congress and have pushed these goddamned hate speech laws, used selectively against Whites only, down our throats. If Dr. Paul capitulates to this sort of bullying, it's all over for him. His message of freedom extends to everyone, even the long-suffering Euro-American majority.

http://lonestartimes....

Thursday, October 25, 2007
EXCLUSIVE: SPECIFIC CONTRIBUTION BY LEADING NEO-NAZI TO RON PAUL CAMPAIGN IDENTIFIED
by LST Staff | 10/25/2007 4:59 pm

????????-
A LoneStarTimes.com investigation has conclusively established that a leading figure in the American neo-Nazi / White-Supremacist movement has provided financial support to Ron Paul?s 2008 Presidential campaign.

The individual in question is Don Black, the founder, owner and operator of Stormfront, a ?white power? website that both professional journalists and watch-dog groups have identified as the premier English-language racist/hate-site on the Internet.

Previous LST posts have focused on banner ?widgets? appearing on the front-page of Stormfront. It is important to emphasize that these are NOT ?advertisements? placed on Stormfront BY the Paul campaign, but rather publicly-available graphics that Stormfront?s owner has chosen to place himself, with links directly to Paul?s donation page.

Nevertheless, LST has in the past several weeks raised a series of questions for the Paul campaign; specifically?

Can Paul confirm that the donation widgets appearing on Stormfront are the result of the site owner?s actions, not the campaign?s?
Will Paul take measures to block Stormfront as a referring URL to his own website, so that no future donations can possibly flow into his campaign from a site that serves as the on-line nexus of neo-Nazism?
Will Paul ask his own web-staff to trace past donations that were made by anyone arriving at his campaign?s webpage from Stormfront, so that these contributions can be rejected?
Will Paul explore if there are any legal actions available to try to remove his donation widget from Stormfront, and if so pursue them?
At the very least, will Paul personally state publicly, vigorously and unmistakably that he rejects the support of white supremacists, and that he will not knowingly tolerate their involvement with his campaign in any form or to any degree?
LoneStarTimes.com?s managing editor Matt Bramanti left multiple messages last week for officials in Paul?s national campaign press office seeking comment. None were returned.

In the interim, a number of grassroots supporters of Paul?s campaign? including many honorable and regular readers of LST? have argued that?

It is unfair to hold Paul responsible for receiving political support from racists/neo-Nazis if that support was unsolicited by Paul;
Paul hasn?t, in fact, solicited white-supremacist support; AND
Paul?s campaign has no practical way of knowing whether or not a specific financial contribution made has come from a neo-Nazi.
These abstract debates are now moot? a contribution to the Paul campaign by a known white-supremacist has been identified.

The evidence is as follows:

Black proudly and openly identifies himself as Stormfront?s guiding hand, and publishes a contact address on the Internet? PO Box 6637, West Palm Beach, FL, 33405
A search by LST of public databases indicates that there is only one ?Don Black? residing in West Palm Beach, Florida, zip code 33405
A 7/16/01 USA Today article identifies Black?s wife as being named ?Chloe?
That same article identifies Chloe as being the ex-wife of close Black associate and former ?Grand Wizard? of the Ku Klux Klan, David Duke
Minutes of a 9/7/07 City of West Palm Beach code-compliance hearing identify ?Chloe H. Duke? as owning a residential property located at 203 Lakeland Drive
According to Federal Election Commission records, on 9/30/07 the Ron Paul presidential campaign received a $500 contribution from a Mr. Don Black, who lists his address as 203 Lakeland Drive and identifies his occupation as ?self-employed/website manager?
In light of these facts, we believe our previously asked questions continue to have merit.

A final note? it is traditional in political campaigns for candidates to return contributions from ?toxic? donors once sufficient public scrutiny and outcry has been generated.

The difficulty in this instance is that if Ron Paul returns these funds to Mr. Black, all he will have done is given a neo-Nazi $500 more dollars with which to spread his psychotic bile.

We would therefore like to suggest that the Ron Paul campaign donate Black?s $500 to any of the following worthy recipients?

United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ($500 would make Dr. Paul a ?sustaining member?)
One Family Fund (which works to rebuild the shattered lives of Israeli victims of Arab terror; $500 would make Dr. Paul a ?healer?)
Aish Ha?Torah (dynamic Jewish educational foundation; Aish donations are set according to funky Kabbalah-based giving levels?$18, $36, $180, etc.?but for $500 Dr. Paul could simultaneously become a ?Friend of the Wall? and a ?Gate of Wisdom,? which would entitle him to both a Sterling Silver Menorah bookmark with certificate of authenticity from the Israel Museum in Jerusalem, and a Western Wall Images CD with over 500 unique photos of life at the Western Wall? perfect ?re-gifting? items for the fast-approaching Hanukkah season)
We try to be helpful.

Matt Bramanti, Managing Editor (Gentile Stooge)
David Benzion, Publisher (Z.O.G. Chapter #1948 President)
LoneStarTimes.com
Frank K
Posted Oct 26, 2007 10:10 AM
user 4795818
Columbus, OH
Post #: 264
You're not helping matters.


I fully support free speech and Don Black is protected by the Constitution. The point of freedom of speech is protecting the people you don't agree with. Anyone should be allowed to donate to whosoever they want and the campaign should uphold the Constitution and keep the money.

The media is certainly trying hard aren't they. Geeze.
Patricia Davis
Posted Oct 26, 2007 10:20 AM
PatriciaDavis
Ava, MO
Post #: 338
I've got a question for you, Will: If Ron Paul was black, or jewish, would you be supporting him?
JimInLisle
Posted Oct 26, 2007 10:35 AM
user 4240003
Lisle, IL
Post #: 360
> Must Dr. Paul capitulate to our Jewish masters' demands?

I don't know about you, but I don't have any 'Jewish masters' and neither does Ron Paul. Oh wait, the girl I'm dating is Jewish so maybe I do!

- Jim
http://www.myspace.co...
John Drake
Posted Oct 26, 2007 11:02 AM
user 2791261
Nashville, TN
Post #: 280
I've got a question for you, Will: If Ron Paul was black, or jewish, would you be supporting him?

Maybe. But he wouldn't show up to any Ron Paul event. Rather he's exercise his "God given right not to race mix". ;)

Regards,

John M. Drake
John Drake
Posted Oct 26, 2007 11:09 AM
user 2791261
Nashville, TN
Post #: 281
You're not helping matters.

I TOTALLY agree!


I fully support free speech and Don Black is protected by the Constitution. The point of freedom of speech is protecting the people you don't agree with. Anyone should be allowed to donate to whosoever they want and the campaign should uphold the Constitution and keep the money.

The media is certainly trying hard aren't they. Geeze.

Hmmmm....so a campaign doesn't have a right to refuse money? Where is that written in the constitution? Frankly I think this is a non issue and I don't care. Ron Paul isn't racist. He doesn't support Stormfront's agenda. Some people get all "gushy eyed" from Dr. Paul criticizing the 1964 civil rights bill, but if you read what he said he approved of public and private actions against forced segregation (which in itself was legal oppression of blacks and whites) though he didn't feel that particular bill was good. Ron Paul has never posted on Stormfarts website, asked for their endorsement or expressed sympathy for their extremist views. If I was a member of that organization (they would never let me join) I could see how I'd be attracted to a candidate that supported the 2nd amendment as was against the government spying on groups that it considered "domestic terrorists." But I'd feel the same way if I was a member of the New Black Panthers or the Nation of Islam.

Regards,

John M. Drake
Patricia Davis
Posted Oct 26, 2007 11:12 AM
PatriciaDavis
Ava, MO
Post #: 339
I don't have any 'Jewish masters' and neither does Ron Paul. Oh wait, the girl I'm dating is Jewish so maybe I do!

She's lucky to have a boyfriend who understands that women belong in the role of master ;).
A former member
Posted Oct 26, 2007 2:19 PM
Post #: 533
You're not helping matters.


I fully support free speech and Don Black is protected by the Constitution. The point of freedom of speech is protecting the people you don't agree with. Anyone should be allowed to donate to whosoever they want and the campaign should uphold the Constitution and keep the money.

The media is certainly trying hard aren't they. Geeze.

Media is plural for medium, BTW, so, yes, they are trying hard to negate what you and I, at least, both agree about, Frank, that Mr. Black has the same freedom of speech that we and Patricia and John and Jim are guaranteed under the First Amendment of the US Constitution. In fact Mr. Black's speech is arguably even more protected, seeing as how his speech is demonized selectively, as it is, as "hate speech" in these days of extreme Political Correctness.

And whatever candidate Mr. Black supports he deserves to do so without being smeared by self-appointed watchdogs and his candidate of choice suffering demands to personally repudiate Mr. Black's generosity and to give his donation to some Holocaust museum. Geeze! is right.

I like pointing out double standards and hypocrisy whenever I see them. Some are so conditioned by the controlled mass media that they can't see what's clear to me. I believe Dr. Paul feels as I do about double standards and hypocrisy. I'm pretty adept at drawing out the usual suspects that don't mind these double standards, those that hold such hate in their hearts for people like Don Black and visitors to his "Stormfart" for having the temerity to work for the interests of the White majority. I expect Andy Panken to join the chorus of hypocrites that think everybody is equal, but some are just more equal, some less. cool

The only "matter" at issue in this thread is whether there is a double standard being applied to Mr. Black and those who participate in his discussion board, "Stormfart," as John calls it. Who hates whom here? It's clear that several hate Mr. Black because they are thoroughly conditioned by mass media to do so. I'd wager that they have never visited "Stormfart" and I must assume by their denunciation of Mr. Black that they agree with the article. I may be "helpful" to some by pointing out double standards and the hypocrisy of others.
A former member
Posted Oct 26, 2007 2:21 PM
Post #: 534
I've got a question for you, Will: If Ron Paul was black, or jewish, would you be supporting him?

Like who? Why do you ask?
A former member
Posted Oct 26, 2007 2:24 PM
Post #: 535
You're not helping matters.

I TOTALLY agree!


I fully support free speech and Don Black is protected by the Constitution. The point of freedom of speech is protecting the people you don't agree with. Anyone should be allowed to donate to whosoever they want and the campaign should uphold the Constitution and keep the money.

The media is certainly trying hard aren't they. Geeze.

Hmmmm....so a campaign doesn't have a right to refuse money? Where is that written in the constitution? Frankly I think this is a non issue and I don't care. Ron Paul isn't racist. He doesn't support Stormfront's agenda. Some people get all "gushy eyed" from Dr. Paul criticizing the 1964 civil rights bill, but if you read what he said he approved of public and private actions against forced segregation (which in itself was legal oppression of blacks and whites) though he didn't feel that particular bill was good. Ron Paul has never posted on Stormfarts website, asked for their endorsement or expressed sympathy for their extremist views. If I was a member of that organization (they would never let me join) I could see how I'd be attracted to a candidate that supported the 2nd amendment as was against the government spying on groups that it considered "domestic terrorists." But I'd feel the same way if I was a member of the New Black Panthers or the Nation of Islam.

Regards,

John M. Drake

Hrumph! I sure punched your button, didn't I, John? You haven't been removed from Move.org long enough to get all that liberal crap out of your neck yet. I understand.
Powered by mvnForum