Worldwide Ron Paul Campaigns Meetup Message Board › GOOOH pronounced GO!

GOOOH pronounced GO! GET OUR OF OUR HOUSE Plan to Break the Democrat/Republic Paradigm!

  • 1
  • 2
Anna Yeisley
Posted Jun 28, 2009 11:35 AM
AnnaYeisley
Spotsylvania, VA
Post #: 57
Hi my name is Anna Yeisley, I am a local organizer for Campaign for Liberty in Spotsylvania, Virgnia and if you haven't yet, please check out GOOOH.com!

I went to my first GOOOH meeting and Tim Cox had a group of 120 people (broken up into groups of 6 peope) talking with conviction and persuasion to members of their group. After answering 20 thought provoking questions, we all had a chance to vote for or against and share our ideas with others. This exercise was so helpful in broadening your own perspective and knowledge pool. It's amazing how smart the common citizen is!!! Even those in the group not comfortable with speaking in front of others, were comfortable to speak with just one other person. That was another part of the exercise. The group of 6 then breaks up into groups of two. By the end of the night were were close, open to other ideas and we all learned a lot. PLUS incredibly, we were able to vote for the person who we thought the candidate for our region out of our group.

It's was a wonderful exercise in citizen engagement in our political system and this idea may be what turns our government from a government of corporations, banks and international interests BACK to a government of the We the People instead of WE the SHEEPLE! goooh.com
Big Allen
Posted Aug 3, 2009 4:02 PM
BigAllen
Henderson, NV
Post #: 3,056
You will be an old lady before his could happen. This system is set up for a two party system an the two parties that are in power are not going to let go. Power is a terrible thing to give away just ask all the Dems and Reps in congress. If you want to try for competition in the party system , use your looks!
Anna Yeisley
Posted Aug 4, 2009 6:08 AM
AnnaYeisley
Spotsylvania, VA
Post #: 92
The Republicans and the Democrats have let our country down and will continue to do so because they are loyal to their control not to American principles of truth, justice or liberty. If we don't try to break their monopoly then seems state secession may be our only way of altering or abolishing a system that is no longer responsive to the American populace.
Big Allen
Posted Aug 5, 2009 10:59 PM
BigAllen
Henderson, NV
Post #: 3,068
Do you knw how many people think like you, not enough. It will take lots of money and a lot of influential people to even get it started and like I said, almost impossible. What is it you want the government to do? I am a Democrat and I like the idea of helping those that need help in this country. You sound like a Republican and you talk a little nonsense with your secession talk. I suggest you move to a country that has a small amount of people and start your own society and bring all those that think like you along! Start with the Govenor of Texas.
Anna Yeisley
Posted Aug 6, 2009 7:21 AM
AnnaYeisley
Spotsylvania, VA
Post #: 94
I've been a democrat most of my voting adult life, I became politically outraged during the Bush administration starting with the Supreme Court deciding the 2000 election. Then the too many unanswered questions after 9/11; the Patriot Act and the unwarranted invasion of Iraq the lies, deception, so forth.

So hating the Republic Party does seem the logical choice and I have had my stint at believing the Republic Party to be responsible for the corruption lies and economic deterioration of our country. I've come to realize that we miss the point by looking at one party or another as responsible for the fiasco that his happening to our country right before our eyes.

There is a plan to globalize America. And those that have put this plan into action over 50 years ago, really 100 years ago have been using the dissention and polarization of the political parties to confuse who is really doing what to America. The plan is to put the world economy into the hands of a few elite, (of course it already is in the hands of a few elite, but they don't own everything due to mainly the sovereignty of nations) but the nations are still too rich for complete global domination. In America, particularly, because of the Constitution which guarantees the security and rights of individuals, up and above the State or government, is a particular annoying thorn in the side. The only way to break the hold of virtuous individualistic government is through lies, deception and corruption; which is why the big move against transparency that is ongoing through the Obama administration.

When the Republic Party is in the elitists use the military and unwarranted government spending to deplete our economy and deteriorate the Constitution. When the Democratic Party is in the elitists capitalize on the social programs and the unwarranted spending to deplete our economy and deteriorate the Constitution. Both Parties have played into deteriorating our Constitution and depleting our economy - the differences between George Bush and Obama are realistically nominal in terms of broken campaign promises, lack of transparency, foreign policy, economic policy. They are both identical in terms of depleting our reserves and ignoring the economic necessity of creating income before spending it. The massive unprecedented national debt is due to a concerted effort by the leaders of the Republicans and now the Democrats putting our nation in as much debt as possible.

The Federal Reserve, that has been supported by both parties, yet accountable to neither has been hugely responsible for artificially planned interest spikes deliberately causing the housing bubbles to pop which is causing the biggest amounts of foreclosures and closing of small businesses in our history.

Obama is part of the clan. He received more contributions from Wall Street than any other candidate in history. He has not disclosed his school transcriptions, nor any work done as a lawyer in Chicago, do we know nothing about him except what his handlers have decided to tell us with no evidence offered. Not only has Obama refused to produce his medical records, his school transcripts, his original birth certificate, the candidate who told America that we was ALL for transparency and told us he was a better candidate has recently refused to disclose information regarding: -- “cash-for-clunkers” rebate program that would substantiate—or undercut—White House claims of the program’s success, even as the president presses the Senate for a quick vote for $2 billion to boost car sales -- "Obama administration is fighting to block access to names of visitors to the White House, taking up the Bush administration argument that a president doesn't have to reveal who comes calling to influence policy decisions."

We don't know anything about Obama and he will make sure that that stays that way. Meanwhile, Americans are following him blindly not caring that he has already lied to us about allowing the public 5 days to read the bills he's pushing through - he believes the Constitution is fundamentally flawed although he swore an oath to defend it. He's related to Dick Cheney for heaven's sake! And to Bush. He's not an accident that the American people discovered! He's there to do a job of complete deterioration of our economy (whatever Bush left of it) and move us in a direction of completely disregarding the Constitution which is our only protection against the plans to globalize America.

I believe, like many, that Obama's role is to finish what George Bush did not, to strip America of her sovereignty by disregard of the Constitution. His advisors are made up of the powerhouse of international financial elitists (Bilderberg Group, CFR, Wall Street, and the Federal Reserve) that are doing what they will with our country with no obligation to save our economy or our Constitution or our posterity. Using the polarization and ruse of political parties and the general ignorance of the American public to cover up the fact that this ruling group of financial elitists has no other designs but to destroy America as a nation and offer our land to the highest bidders and offer our people as servants to the ruling elite. The difference between a slave and a free man is property ownership. Stripping us of our property creates a nation of servants to the ruling financial elites of which one is suspect is Barrack Obama.

What to do about it? It's so far gone; the only ideas come from the state secession and state rights and sovereignty movements; restore the power to the states as what was outlined in the Constitution, ultimately reducing power of the federal government.
Big Allen
Posted Aug 6, 2009 6:41 PM
BigAllen
Henderson, NV
Post #: 3,077
You are very deep. You make allegations about the president and assume the worst. What so far has the president done that makes him bad? You should be looking into Bush's military records and find our why he was not seen at his base when he was supposed to be there. You go after a president that is trying to give the poor people of this country a chance to live a better life with health care. This is a president that just signed a bill to give veterans four years at a state college for free. Early in his presidency he signed SCHIP inorder to give poor kids health care. This was all done in a short time and you carry on about some conspiracy that he is involved in. If this is bad then what is good and name the president that you like? If you have a job you need another to occupy your mind all the time!
Anna Yeisley
Posted Aug 7, 2009 7:05 AM
AnnaYeisley
Spotsylvania, VA
Post #: 95
I was in a dark mood yesterday, I appreciate your correspondence.

I do fear that the unseen ruling powers are destroying America. Bush displayed a propensity for deception and criminal activity, more so than anyone in office. Bush's agenda had very little to do with American representation, he was not focused on ensuring a strong economy (how can you be strong militarily and weak economically?). Obama was the lesser 'evil' so to speak, between McCain in office and Obama, but his lack of disclosure, not just speaking of the birth certificate, but he refused to release budgetary numbers this month, he refused to release numbers that the Cars for Clunker program was based upon. How can you trust a person who has refused to release any evidence of the social, political, educational background that he claims? He's showing the same secrecy and hiding as the previous administration and look at his foreign policy.

Obama continues the same foreign policy as Bush. Why are we in the Middle East? To quell Terrorism? How can we quell terrorism when our government lied about Iraq having weapons of mass destruction, invaded without evidence and without a congressional declaration of war and killed between 60,000 and 600,000? Does America really think it can fight terrorism by acting like terrorists?

I thought we wanted to bring our troops home and get out of the Middle East - there's no purpose to be there except for oil - Iraq is the 2nd largest oil reserve left on the planet and Afghanistan is the proposed home for a multi billion pipeline that will allow natural gas to be transported from Asia across Afghanistan to Pakistan. Afghanistan and Pakistan are not cooperating so to me it is no coincidence that Obama is sending troops in there. http://www.energybull.... Billions of dollars have already been invested to build this natural gas pipeline that will make lots of money for those who invested. The only problem is that Afghanistan and Pakistan rejects the puny percentage of the profit to have their land taken over by foreign profiteers.

So our economy is being drained and our soldiers are being killed to support military action in the Middle East so those who profit from monopolizing the global energy reserves can continue to make monopolize our energy needs. Will America see any of that wealth? We can doubt it. International corporations will make money, with our government's blessing; International corporations are shielded from US taxation. This is the danger about being in bed with the international investors and central bankers. The money made from our war efforts will stay in the pockets of those who monopolize the global economy.

Obama is answering to the petroleum cartels and the war profiteers to direct his foreign policy. This is the fear for there is an international push for globalization and bringing all nations under one global national government. The UN is only a forerunner. This would mean the loss of sovereignty of established nations; America would become virtually a 'state' of a larger global nation. Clinton and Bush, Sr. work all over the globe, marketing for economic globalization that masks a more insidious goal of the establishment of this global government. Here’s a clip of Walter Cronkite, explaining quite innocently the need for a loss of national sovereignty to fulfill the goal of the World Federation Association. Important clip, please see http://www.youtube.co...
A Loss of sovereignty will require a loss of our Constitutional protections and system of government because our Constitution would no longer be valid because we'd no longer be a sovereign nation for it to protect.

Every time a spending bill comes through I burn with fury. If Obama wants to help poor people, the working class and the few fortunate not classed as such, create INCOME. Not phony credit income that is only robbing from our children to show better numbers. Our country is outsourcing our jobs; we have the lowest production in terms of good, services and commodity distribution of our history. Lower and lower test scores mean less and less innovation and competition with the global market.

Paying for health care, and paying money so people can buy cars does not create INCOME nor improve market competition. Who is going to pay for all these social programs, if no one is working????

If Obama wanted to help the poor in this country his first focus should be to boost national revenue which would produce jobs and better income. Don't give people food, give them land and seed and equipment to grow their own! Don't just hand out health insurance, promote job growth and increase national revenue so incomes can pay for independent lives that pay for our own healthy food and health care. The problem with this common sense philosophy called financial independence is that the power and money gets in the hands of individuals and that's one thing a large centralized government is opposed to. They prefer 'wealth distribution' so that citizens make the minimum the rest of the wealth goes to the government and to those who rule.

All this talk about helping poor people with medical costs, housing costs, foods costs, sounds like you're doing a good thing, but if our government isn't smart enough to realize that creating jobs enables folks to support themselves, I don't want our future generations to pay for that ignorance. Creating jobs and boosting national revenue should be the sole job of government not spending our children money in order to create a nation dependent upon a powerful central government.

Encouraging dependency on government is national self sabotage. We have to produce and create something to boost national revenue and to better the lives of Americans. Then you get government OUT and allow free enterprise to work.

There are a lot of patented alternative energy technology that is being bought up by the motor vehicle industry and fuel industry to keep this alternative energy technology tucked away. This could be an incredible source of national income if we were to create laws to prohibit corporate purchasing of alternative energy patents so they can be bought by developers. Seed patents are being used to force independent farmers out of business (see the Future of Food rent from Netflix) but agriculture is another important national commodity that has been taken out of the ownership of American citizens and into the hands of corporations and government.

There’s a lot to be done to improve domestic revenue, but our government has no interest in boosting national economy. It is my suspicion, and I'm not alone, that due to the influence of international financial cartels and the world central banking system, our country is being systematically depleted of wealth to create a national panic which will force an allegiance and dependence upon joining a larger more powerful global nation that will not have the same principles of individual liberty and we'll be at the mercy of the folks who have been running the global economy creating wars to pursue their goals. We do not want our children or theirs in the hands of those who purport one world government.
Anna Yeisley
Posted Aug 8, 2009 9:05 AM
AnnaYeisley
Spotsylvania, VA
Post #: 96

Important Clip - Summarizes the Nation's Growing Distrust of the Obama Administration

http://www.youtube.co...
Big Allen
Posted Aug 8, 2009 3:31 PM
BigAllen
Henderson, NV
Post #: 3,082
You have to realize that you are a small fish in a big ocean. You can think what you want but what can you change? I agree with on Afganistan and Iraq as far as we need to get out ASAP but what we want does not matter as we really have no say. I am three times your age and I seen a lot of people like you but not one has changed anything yet! You can live your life and worry about anything you want but what do you think that you can change? I see Obama as a man that wants to make this a better country but it seems that a certain party that wants power back is going to try and stop him. Take time and look into the trouble that the Republicans have taken this country into. Look at Blackwater, the contracters in Iraq that killed innocent civillions and laughted. These are supposed to be religious men but they are murderers. These are Bush's men. If you want to get outraged try this topic on.
Anna Yeisley
Posted Aug 9, 2009 12:33 AM
AnnaYeisley
Spotsylvania, VA
Post #: 100

Al, Al, Al - for one thing if you were 3 times my age, that would make you over 150.

Fundamental principle of our country, long forgotten. The individual is POWERFUL. Not only are we created in the image of God and have God-given inalienable rights - thought is POWERFUL. A liberty minded individual is a thousand times more powerful than any TV commercial and 2 liberty minded individuals 10,000 times more powerful than any campaign ad on national TV. Why? How? Because the human mind creates what it sees - you add a little 'faith' to a human mind and there is no stopping the manifestation of that thought. When the fundamentals of liberty are discussed and taught, economy picks up. Ingenuity and innovation are renewed. The secret of success in terms of economic revival is the conversation and sharing of ordinary, everyday Americans regarding liberty, the truly free market etc.

Our economy is bouncing back, quite miraculously and don't be foolish enough to think that Obama is having anything to do with it. What's happening is people taking stands and becoming powerful and fearless.

This is how socialistic government has always worked. The populace is traumatized through economic downturn, fake national emergency, hate propaganda, and the populace become afraid and insecure. This is when socialistic government swoops down and offers comfort and promises luring the unsuspecting into complete loss of freedom and prosperity.

Fearlessness, on the other hand, is what creates free enterprise. Faith in God, faith in goodness of others creates innovation and stirs production.

Obama is a phony. A very good actor / but he's been trained to be liked and trusted. Now that he's in office, I"m sure no one is as surprised as he is, that he actually has to live up to his illusion of being an honest American. If you can't defend the Constitution, you are not a true American, in my opinion.

Obama believes the Constitution is a racist document, written by racists and supported today by racists. He adheres very little to constitutional principles and is determined to undermine the authority of the Constitution for his socialistic ideals. You will never see us out of the Middle East as long as Obama is in office, likewise any other candidate that is chosen for us by the financial elite. You want to see change? Vote for someone like Ron Paul. A constitutionalist from his core. Consistent and spot on.

  • 1
  • 2
Powered by mvnForum