If this is not understood, Dr. Ron Paul loses, he must get into the primaries and win, New Infomation

In case RP ends up not being the nominee, won't it still be possible that he can win the election as a write-in candidate? if that is true then we need to keep it in mind as a back-up plan, rather than saying "It's all over".

Most states do not read the write in names. They put them in a box and forget about them. Only if there were so many it might make a difference would they be read, but even then we would lose because they wouldn't be able to read the write-ins.

Trust me. On the ballot or no chance at all. None.

Important read
Raymond

Many thanks, Hope. We're forwarding your suggestions to our pro-Paul friends.

--bob & lou
www.wynman.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Hope Marston
To: lou & dr. bob at lake tahoe
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 10:09 AM
Subject: NSL Resolutions sweeping the country


Hi Lou and Dr. Bob,

Recently, a few developments have set the stage for community action consistent with the work Ron Paul is doing in Congress, and could help raise public awareness so that more people are actively engaged in defending and restoring the Bill of Rights.

1. The American Library Association passed a resolution on June 27, opposing the FBI's overuse and misuse of National Security Letters (NSLs), which collect personal information on ordinary Americans without any connection to terrorism. The library associations in Vermont, Minnesota and North Carolina have passed resolutions, and it appears Arizona will be next on board, either this week or early next. This could be an excellent time to join with local librarians in demanding a community resolution, like those passed by Eureka Springs, Arkansas and Brighton, NY. We have a chance here for a wildfire of public unrest to reach Washington, D.C.!

American Library Association resolution: http://www.ala.org/al...
Eureka Springs resolution: http://bordc.org/deta...
Brighton resolution: http://bordc.org/deta...

2. The Bill of Rights Defense Committee is finishing a 30-minute video on National Security Letters, which it will provide to groups planning community discussions on the misuse of NSLs. It's an ideal vehicle for local discussion to lead off a resolution campaign. Would you like to learn more about how you can get involved in organizing a showing?

3. Constitution Day is coming up on September 17, and all schools in the U.S. are required to do a program on the Constitution. It's a very good chance to work with schools to present a community-wide program on some of these Constitutional failures that have taken place since 9/11. It can also be a good opportunity to show the BORDC video and lead off a community discussion about what can be done locally to stand up for our privacy, guaranteed in the Fourth Amendment.

I know you're working very hard to get information out about Ron Paul's campaign. The BORDC is not involved in any political campaigns, but we recognize that some in Congress have been bellweather protectors of the Bill of Rights. I've laid out a few opportunities to build your base, by building on the Bill of Rights violations of the current administration. I hope you'll join us in focusing for a bit on these local ways we can drum up support for the important issues that must be part of the discussion around who will be the next leader of the United States. We need to make sure the public awareness is strongly built around how government abuses have touched the lives of us all. The abuse of the PATRIOT Act-enhanced power of National Security Letters is one way that we all may have already been, or have increased potential to be violated by government overreach.

Let me know if you're interested in talking about this some more. Thanks!
Hope

Hope Marston
Bill of Rights Defense Committee
Western Region Organizer
PO Box 51434
Eugene, OR 97405
541 683-1604
hmarston@bordc.org
http://bordc.org...

Dear Mike:

Outstanding information for everyone and it is all fee, how wonderful.

We will take the corrupt IRS out on it's Knees and soon. Yes we do have to have taxes and there are solutions for that. Dr Ron Paul has some great answers on how to do that.

Love Ya

Raymond








-------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- --
From: "Jack Bauer" <bowersecret@gmail.com>
Subject: Great information on why you do not have to pay Federal Income Tax!!!
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:14:23 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.214.233]) by bay0-mc4-f9.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:14:49 -0700
Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 34so305679hui for <rdodson38@hotmail.com>; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.100.14 with SMTP id x14mr5486167wxb.1185563663903; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.55.11 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:14:23 -0700 (PDT)

This will give you some more information on the income tax issue. I have some very intelligent people that belong to Dr Ron Paul's Meet-Up group this came from that group.
Raymond

Welcome
Your City
Map
Message Boards
800-320-1400 Tax Lawyers
Owe over 20K? Settle Taxes for Less As Seen on CNN, Free Consultation
www.PowerTaxRelief.com
IRS Problems?
Free consultation with the expert who will handle your case.
ustaxsolutionsinc.com
Corporate Tax Incentives
Proven Experience & Client Focused Managed Tax Credit Solutions
www.centerprisegroup.com
IRS Tax Help & Relief
Ex-IRS Agents Solve IRS problems up to 99% off tax debt 800-933-4947
www.WeFixIRS.com
Ads by Google
IRS loses challenge to prove tax liability

This is from Gary Frenchi:

That make real sense, all of us, lets think about that.
Can you imagine how successful we could be as a nation?
Raymond

Dear Ron Paul Meet-up member,

After the primaries and election what should be done about all the momentum of the Ron Paul Campaign? The answer is quite simple "Become Ron Paul!"

Each of the Ron Paul meet-up groups have already served as a nucleus for the campaign. Participating, supporting, and spreading the ideals of Ron Paul is something we know we can be successful at. Why not parlay those new found skills and networks to choose a leader in your Ron Paul Meet-up to throw the hat into the ring and run for a public office?

State-Senator, State-Representative, US Congressmen, US Senator, Mayor, County Sheriff... all those jobs need to be filled by people who hold Ron Paul's ideals... why not be you?

The infrastructure is clearly in place. The skills, creativity, and teamwork established is there, the only part of the equation not there is the leader to rise from your meet-up group.

Imagine the possibilities, every Ron Paul meet-up group converted into an individual campaign for a leader from your group! This way, win or loose, we can still change the country from within.

The powers that be would tremble at the thought of THOUSANDS of Ron Paul's taking hold and running for office.

Each meet-up group is a campaign unto itself. Keep this thought in mind at your next meet-up group meeting and consider bringing it up for discussion.

Are you ready to become Ron Paul?

Please pass this message along to meet-up groups, post it in forums, blogs and in MySpace bulletins, this message needs to be spread!


Yours Sincerely in Freedom and Truth,

Gary Franchi
RTR National Director
http://www.restorethe...
Member "The Greater Chicago Ron Paul 2008 Meetup Group"
http://ronpaul.meetup...
Member "National Ron Paul Campaign Supporters"
http://ronpaul.meetup...



PS. Join the "Become Ron Paul" discussion here:
http://restoretherepu...

Hello Boys and Girls:

This post says it all. Please copy this information and hand it out, maybe in your shopping mall.
The information is going to be an eye opener for most.
Part 1-2

Raymond

Ron Paul: In for the Long Haul
by Scott Sutton

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."
~ Mahatma Gandhi


"The presidency is now a cross between a popularity contest and a high school debate, with an encyclopedia of cliches the first prize."
~ Saul Bellow

About Ron Paul's Fundraising


On July 15th, the Federal Election Commission announced the 2nd-quarter fundraising totals for each presidential candidate. In the Republican field, Ron Paul's $2.4 million placed him:


3rd in total receipts for the quarter
4th in total receipts to date
3rd in total current assets (ahead of former front-runner John McCain, and just $800,000 behind Mitt Romney)
Thus far, 47% of the contributions made to Ron Paul's campaign are donations of under $200 from individuals (John McCain's 17% is the second-highest percentage). This is a telling statistic, as it highlights the fact that most other candidates rely heavily upon donations from corporate interests and political action committees (PACs) ( i.e. moneyed, influence-seeking sources who can readily afford to contribute large sums). Since Congressman Paul has always voted against special favors and privileges for anyone, special interests know they have nothing to gain by stuffing Ron Paul's campaign coffers. As one member of my local Meetup group put it on a home-made sign, "Ron Paul is thin because he won't let special interests buy him lunch."

Among all candidates, Dr. Paul is now first in total donations from military personnel and veterans. While this may come as a surprise to some, Tom Engelhardt identified the primary reason when he asked rhetorically, "why should (military personnel) want to be endlessly redeployed to a lost war in a lost land?" (see Why the US Military Loves Ron Paul).


Why, indeed ? President Paul would bring them home now.


The Ron Paul Buzz


As anyone familiar with the Ron Paul campaign knows, official fundraising figures tell only a small part of the story. This campaign is a genuine grassroots movement, driven primarily by the independent efforts of Dr. Paul's enthusiastic supporters ? a wide-ranging constituency that includes disenfranchised anti-war Democrats, traditional conservatives, Constitutionalists, anti-corporatists, free traders, libertarians, Christians, Hindus, atheists, druids, hobbits, wizards, and a host of others. Although a seemingly disparate group, these people share a genuine concern about America's ongoing slide toward authoritarianism, empire, and bankruptcy.


This building wave of support takes many forms ? from the proliferation of Ron Paul Web sites , blogs, and merchandise, to public "banner brigades" and pamphleteering, to private conversations and e-mail threads ? and some estimates assess the economic value of these independent activities at more than $10 million per quarter.


No candidacy has generated more buzz than Ron Paul's, and the following statistics prove the point:


"Ron Paul" recently topped Technorati's search-term rankings for an unprecedented stretch ? current rank #2 (Technorati is the leading authority on Internet media usage).
RonPaul2008.com draws more traffic than any other candidate's Web site.
On YouTube.com, the Internet's most popular video site, the Ron Paul channel has over 22,000 subscribers, which is 13,000 more than the second most popular candidate (Obama).
And on Meetup.com, more than 25,000 people comprise 560 Ron Paul Meetup groups, which makes the Good Doctor the most popular Meetup source in the political category. The next candidate, Obama, is a distant second with 5300 members in 68 groups.

Notes: All statistics reflect current numbers as of July 23, 2007. Also, for those who don't know, Meetup.com is the most popular Internet site for people with common interests who want to organize events and activities with one another ? consequently, it's the most commonly used online resource for coordinating political activities.

Some commentators say this interest and support is illusory, perhaps even the product of a centralized Internet effort led by the Ron Paul campaign. Yet, the Paul campaign has only spent $600,000 to date, while other candidates have already burned through tens of millions. Although Paul's campaign staff is growing, it doesn't even have the resources to provide timely responses to the flood of incoming e-mails (I speak from personal experience here), much less oversee such a sustained, widespread, technologically-sophisticated endeavor.

The skeptics also ignore an obvious question ? if it's so easy to jerry-rig Internet statistics, why haven't other, better-financed campaigns done the same? ( Answer: It's not easy and, in many cases, it's simply impossible.) While I personally don't know of anyone who spends their time spamming online polls or repeatedly Googling their favorite candidate's name, I have no doubt such people exist in the ranks of most political movements. And given the evident enthusiasm of Ron Paul supporters, it's quite likely that a greater percentage of his backers might attempt to do such things.


That said, I believe there are more plausible reasons for Ron Paul's "online success" ? most importantly, the Internet is the primary source of information about Dr. Paul. As early as last fall ? two full years before the election ? the conventional media and major-party establishments had already anointed the top six Republican and Democratic candidates (Giuliani, McCain, Romney, Clinton, Obama, & Edwards). Since then, countless opinion makers have informed Americans that these six politicians complete the list of "viable" Presidential options. In other words, no need to look further ? we've done your thinking for you.

Part 2-2

How and why this happened exactly is a topic for another day. (Hint ? Follow the money.) The important point here is that each of the Anointed Candidates has received regular, daily coverage since that time (and, in some cases, for several years now). Although Dr. Paul has benefited from a smattering of media attention since his "blowback" exchange with Giuliani in May, people who are curious about Paul's track record and platform must turn to the Internet. The conventional media is most unlikely to begin covering Dr. Paul on a regular basis, no matter how much traction he gains.


Consequently, Ron Paul's supporters must assume the task of spreading the word. Fortunately, many of us are happy to do so, and when people first learn of Dr. Paul's track record, they typically want to know more. As regular readers of my blog know, Ron Paul challenges US foreign policy on a refreshingly honest and fundamental level ? a level of inquiry wholly absent from most political forums. And Dr. Paul's forthrightness doesn't stop with foreign policy, as he applies the same intellectual rigor to issues involving civil liberties, health care, immigration, education, our fiat-money system, and so on.


Reading Tea Leaves


Now, I'm not a political analyst, and things could certainly change in a hurry ? but given the current landscape, some future developments seem rather predictable:


First, Ron Paul's Jeffersonian liberalism will give him a significant advantage over his pro-war, neoconservative competitors. While the other candidates vie for the support of the modern Republican base, Ron Paul provides the only real alternative for any traditional conservatives who remain in the party. Without Ron Paul, each GOP debate would be a brain-dead echo chamber.
Perhaps more importantly, Dr. Paul will appeal to those Americans who long ago abandoned politics because the big-government statism of the two major parties was hostile to their values. With recent voter turnout in presidential elections hovering around 50%, this may be a surprisingly large block of potential voters. For Ron Paul supporters, the key will be finding these people and telling them about Dr. Paul ? a simple, mass-marketing numbers game.

Second, due to this ideological edge and campaign realities, we'll witness a steady whittling of the Republican field in coming months ? a thinning that recently began with Jim Gilmore's exit from the race. With the exception of Ron Paul, the other candidates have spent their funds like drunken Congressmen, and the "second tier" has little to show for their binge. Most of these campaigns suffer from anemic fundraising, a moribund Internet presence, and lackluster crowds (certainly nothing approaching the numerous crowds gathering on Ron Paul's behalf, as documented here, here, here, here, here, and here). By next spring, the existing field of contenders will be reduced to a Final Four ? Giuliani, Fred Thompson, Mitt Romney, and Ron Paul.

Third, Ron Paul is in this race for the long haul ? at least until next September's Republican convention. Thus far, the Paul campaign has run a frugal operation, relying primarily on the efforts of grassroots activists. These efforts are steadily snowballing support, as evidenced by Dr. Paul's three-month ascent from anonymity to 3% in national polls, and that figure will continue to rise at the rate people learn about our candidate. As Jennifer Haman pointed out, Ron Paul leads in the polls of those who have heard him speak. In the meantime, the campaign is shrewdly storing its dry powder ? mounting millions to be meted out at judicious points throughout the campaign.

Only time will tell what the future holds for Ron Paul's presidential bid ? but for now, there's great cause for optimism.

July 27, 2007

Scott G. Sutton, MA, MCP, CMFC [ send him mail] is a technical writer in Portland, Oregon, and a long-time admirer of Dr. Paul's candor, integrity, and efforts on behalf of individual liberty. This piece originally appeared on Mr. Sutton's blog, where he touts Ron Paul's track record on the Iraq War and US foreign policy.

Copyright © 2007 LewRockwell.com


Remember this statement:
"When the government fears the people, you have liberty. When the people fear the government [or the IRS, for that matter], you have Tyranny."
(Thomas Jefferson, author of the Constitution of the United States)

The less people know about what is really going on, the easier it is to wield power and authority.
(Prince of Wales Charles)

Thanks,
Jack Bauer

Hillary is the last women I would want to show me her boobs. I am turned off just looking at her face.

Cleavage & the Clinton Campaign Chest
By Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, July 28, 2007; Page C01


A journalistic assessment of Hillary Clinton's cleavage became the most improbable presidential campaign controversy yet as her team yesterday rolled out a fundraising letter calling a Washington Post column on the subject "grossly inappropriate" and "insulting."

One week after the piece, by fashion writer Robin Givhan, took note of the Democratic candidate's relatively low neckline during a speech on the Senate floor, senior Clinton adviser Ann Lewis urged donors to "take a stand against this kind of coarseness and pettiness in American culture."



Hillary Clinton's noted C-SPAN appearance. (Image From Web)
RELATED DOCUMENT

Clinton Fundraising Letter (pdf)
Fashion
Hillary Clinton's Tentative Dip Into New Neckline Territory
There was cleavage on display Wednesday afternoon on C-SPAN2. It belonged to Sen. Hillary Clinton.

Who's Blogging?
Read what bloggers are saying about this article.

Nova M Radio - Bringing Democracy to the Airwaves
Decaf Democracy
The Hedgehog Report


Full List of Blogs (4 links) »


Most Blogged About Articles
On washingtonpost.com | On the web


Save & Share Article What's This?

DiggGoogle
del.icio.usYahoo!
RedditFacebook




Givhan, who won a Pulitzer Prize for criticism last year, said she disagreed "that there was anything in the column that was coarse, insulting or belittling. It was a piece about a public person's appearance on the Senate floor that was surprising because of the location and because of the person. It's disingenuous to think that revealing cleavage, any amount of it, in that kind of situation is a no issue.

"It's obviously not the most important thing in the campaign. It's obviously not the most important thing Hillary Clinton has ever done, by any means."

Stories about the physical appearance of candidates, from Al Gore's earth-tones wardrobe to John Edwards's $400 haircut to a bathing-suit shot of Barack Obama in a People spread on "Beach Babes," have long been an entertaining sideshow. But since no journalist has plunged into this particular territory, given the predominantly male nature of past White House contests, Givhan's">Givhan's">Givh an's">Givhan's Style column has sparked plenty of reaction, much of it negative. Boston Globe columnist Ellen Goodman wrote yesterday that Givhan "managed to make a media mountain out of a half-inch valley."

Lewis said in an interview she was "appalled" by the column but initially dismissed it as "an inside-the-Beltway story."

"I didn't realize the attention and the anger it was setting off nationally," Lewis added. "Women either read it or heard about it. They were indignant on Hillary's behalf and also on their own." Lewis says she has not discussed the matter with the New York senator.

Lewis's fundraising letter begins: "Can you believe that The Washington Post wrote a 746-word article on Hillary's cleavage? . . . I've seen some off-topic press coverage -- but talking about body parts? That is grossly inappropriate.

"Frankly, focusing on women's bodies instead of their ideas is insulting. It's insulting to every woman who has ever tried to be taken seriously in a business meeting. It's insulting to our daughters -- and our sons -- who are constantly pressured by the media to grow up too fast."

For candidates, using criticism -- real or perceived -- to raise money is catching on as a political maneuver. In last year's Virginia Senate race, after Republican incumbent George Allen got into trouble for using the word "macaca," his campaign sent a letter to supporters blaming the media, and particularly The Post, for creating a "feeding frenzy . . . over something that did not warrant coverage in the first place." After conservative author Ann Coulter mocked Edwards in March, describing him with a slur used against gays, the former North Carolina senator featured the attacks in a fundraising pitch.

Givhan regularly patrols the intersection of fashion and politics. About two years ago, she chastised Vice President Cheney for wearing a fur-trimmed parka rather than more formal attire to a somber ceremony in Poland marking the 60th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz. In April, Givhan scrutinized House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her "generous collection of scarves" during a tour of the Middle East. The column on cleavage described Clinton's clothing choice, as spotted on CSPAN2, as a "small acknowledgment of sexuality and femininity" that departed from her usual "desexualized uniform" of black pantsuits.

"With Clinton," Givhan wrote, "there was the sense that you were catching a surreptitious glimpse at something private. You were intruding -- being a voyeur. Showing cleavage is a request to be engaged in a particular way. . . . It does suggest a certain confidence and physical ease."

"Robin has consistently raised similar questions over the years about both men and women who are in the public eye," said Steve Reiss, The Post's deputy assistant managing editor for Style. "We know these people take a great deal of care in how they present themselves on TV and in public, and that is fair game for analysis." Noting that the newspaper has run dozens of articles on Clinton's policy positions and background, Reiss said, "I don't feel we have anything to apologize for."

Politicians often rip the media over what they see as unfavorable coverage, hoping to score points against an unpopular institution. But the cleavage letter is undoubtedly a first in the annals of campaign counterpunching.

"I would never say the column was about a body part," Givhan said. "It was about a style of dress. People have gone down the road of saying, 'I can't believe you're writing about her breasts.' I wasn't writing about her breasts. I was writing about her neckline."

Staff writer Anne E. Kornblut contributed to this report.


http://www.washington...

You will want to read about Obama. The two Democrats that will be the contenders against Dr Ron Paul will be these two. Obama is a Moslem with teachings of Moslem schools, were they radical teachings ????. I certainly do not want to find out when he is President of the United States, how about you?

Raymond





POLITICS
Obama Rises in New Era Of Black Politicians
In the next few months, TV spots in New Hampshire will start promoting an African American candidate described as a rising star of a new generation, with Chicago roots, Ivy League credentials and a message of hope and idealism.
(By Alec MacGillis and Perry Bacon Jr., The Washington Post)

This is what we are up against.

Raymond

Scientists? Tests Hack Into Electronic Voting Machines in California and Elsewhere
http://www.nytimes.co...


-------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- --


www.coalitionforvisibleballots.org
Sincerely, Michael Wayne, Golden aka RadioRebel
To Subscribe click here

Due to the climate of political correctness now pervading America, Kentuckians, Tennesseans and West Virginians will no longer be referred to as "HILLBILLIES."


You must now refer to them as APPALACHIAN-AMERICANS.


And furthermore,


HOW TO SPEAK ABOUT WOMEN AND BE POLITICALLY CORRECT:


1 She is not a " BABE" or a "CHICK" - She is a " BREASTED AMERICAN."


2. She is not "EASY" - She is "HORIZONTALLY ACCESSIBLE."


3 . She is not a "DUMB BLOND" - She is a "LIGHT-HAIRED DETOUR OFF THE INFORMATION SUPERHIGHWAY."


4. She has not "BEEN AROUND" - She is a "PREVIOUSLY-ENJOYED


5. She does not "NAG" you - She becomes "VERBALLY REPETITIVE."


6. She is not a "TWO- BIT HOOKER" - She is a "LOW COST PROVIDER."




HOW TO SPEAK ABOUT MEN AND BE POLITICALLY CORRECT:


1. He does not have a " BEER GUT" - He has developed a "LIQUID GRAIN STORAGE FACILITY."


2. He is not a " BAD DANCER" - He is "OVERLY Caucasian."


3. He does not "GET LOST ALL THE TIME" - He "INVESTIGATES ALTERNATIVE DESTINATIONS."


4. He is not "BALDING" - He is in "FOLLICLE REGRESSION."


5. He does not act like a "TOTAL ASS" - He develops a case of RECTAL-CRANIAL INVERSION."


6. It's not his "CRACK" you see hanging out of his pants - It's "REAR CLEAVAGE."

This might help in spreading the word for our leader.

I place 20 Zip lock bags with a DVD and all information about Dr Paul under the windshield of 20 disabled marked cars. I do this seven days a week. The disabled person is up there in age and enjoys reading information like this. It works.

I am a disabled person like you

I have a good amount of free time on my hands.
Back about 7 month?s, a friend invited me to go into Carson City and see a documentary by the famous director Aaron Russo called, America Freedom to Fascism. The link to see this documentary is free on Google. http://video.google.c...
copy the link and put it in your address bar. You will like this documentary.


The documentary was about the IRS and the Federal Reserve. I have always been interested in the legality of these two government systems. There was over 500 people came to see that documentary that took over an hour. At the end of that documentary, there was a standing ovation for five minutes. In that documentary a man, named Aaron Russo interviewed Congressman Dr Ron Paul M.D. and the answers that Dr Paul had to say to Aaron Russo fascinated me. I came to find out through my research that Dr Paul was a Presidential contender for 2008 on the republican platform. I decided that I was going to study all candidates in both parties and see what there political platform is. What I found was from political think tanks they made me more interested In Dr Ron Paul and what he stands for. I went into my computer and started to listen to all of his interviews and debates on U-Tube and Google. I found out he has won his three debates.

For the first time in history, the students are spreading the word about Dr Ron Paul because they are concerned about the future of this country and they realize that Dr Paul is not a Republican, but a constitutionalists. The students are concerned that big government is going away from the Constitution and our liberty and freedoms. The students have spread the word by the millions through the Internet and they are convincing their parent to study Dr Ron Paul.

I have been so busy with the Dr Ron Paul's campaign that I have done nothing else. I have studied this election, the candidates and have realized all of us have only one chance in our lifetime to change the direction of this nation from its own demise. This is a serious political situation. This will affect many conditions and life styles, in ways you cannot comprehend. All independent think tanks know we are on the edge of bankruptcy.

Dr Ron Paul, when you study the wonderful man you will see why I am working for him everyday.

Congressman Dr Ron Paul M.D. (Obstetrician & Gynecologist). He delivered over 4000 babies throughout his unselfish medical and military career, and I like that. His voting record over the lifetime of his public record, speaks for it self.

If you would like to contact me, my email is rdodson38@hotmail.com

In God?s Work
Raymond