Messages

"Racial purity" has always been a part of - and a goal of - the ruling elites.

Bet you didn't know that state issued "marriage licenses" came about as a way of preventing
marriages between white and black Americans during the 19th century.

Also that forced sterilizations of the poor and the mentally and physically handicapped - similar
to proposals for dealing with "welfare mothers" coming from some "fiscal conservatives" today - 
were imposed on tens of thousands of (predominantly black) Americans during the interwar period
(particularly) in the American south.

There's much more such evil to be told as well.

Rocky

--- Chris Braddy <[address removed]> wrote:

> *Science making a Real "Arian Nation" finally possible
> 
> If you didn't like the way Hitler was going about it -- your in luck -- 
> now science will determine who to "exterminate" at birth....
> 
> Welcome to the REAL 21st Century
> 
> 
> *
> http://www.worldn...  
> <http://www.worldn...; 
>  
> *Government stakes claim to every newborn's DNA*
> 'We now are considered guinea pigs, instead of human beings with rights'
> April 03, 2008
>  
> By Bob Unruh
> ? 2008 WorldNetDaily
> 
> An Orwellian plan that has state and federal governments staking claim 
> to the ownership of every newborn's DNA in perpetuity is advancing under 
> the radar of most privacy rights activists, but would turn the United 
> States' citizenry into a huge pool of subjects for involuntary 
> scientific experimentation, according to one organization alarmed over 
> the issue.
> 
> "We now are considered guinea pigs, as opposed to human beings with 
> rights," Twila Brase, president of the the Citizens' Council on Health 
> Care, a Minnesota-based organization familiar with the progress in that 
> state.
> 
> She warned ultimately, such DNA databases could spark the next wave of 
> demands for eugenics, the concept of improving the human race through 
> the control of various inherited traits. Margaret Sanger, founder of 
> Planned Parenthood, advocated for eugenics to cull those she considered 
> unfit from the population.
> 
> In 1921, she said eugenics is "the most adequate and thorough avenue to 
> the solution of racial, political and social problems," and she later 
> lamented "the ever increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human 
> beings who never should have been born at all."
> 
> Lawmakers in Minnesota recently endorsed a proposal that would exempt 
> stockpiles of DNA information already being collected from every newborn 
> there from any sort of consent requirements, meaning researchers could 
> utilize the DNA of more than 780,000 Minnesota children for any sort of 
> research project whatsover, Brase said.
> 
> "The Senate just voted to strip citizens of parental rights, privacy 
> rights, patient rights and DNA property rights. They voted to make every 
> citizen a research subject of the state government, starting at birth," 
> she said. "They voted to let the government create genetic profiles of 
> every citizen without their consent."
> 
> The result will be that every newborn's DNA will be collected at birth, 
> "warehoused in a state genomic biobank, and given away to genetic 
> researchers without parent consent -- or in adulthood, without the 
> individual's consent. Already, the health department reports that 42, 
> 210 children have been subjected to genetic research without their 
> consent," Brase told WND.
> 
> She said although her organization works with Minnesota issues, similar 
> laws or rules and regulations already are in use pretty much all across 
> the nation.
> 
> The National Conference of State Legislatures, in fact, lists for all 50 
> states as well as the District of Columbia the various statutes or 
> regulatory provisions under which newborns' DNA is being collected.
> 
> Such programs are offered as "screening" requirements to detect 
> treatable illnesses. They vary as to exactly what tests are done but the 
> Health Resources and Services Administration has requested a report that 
> would "include a recommendation for a uniform panel of conditions."
> 
> Further, Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., is on record proposing a plan that 
> would turn the program into a consolidated nationwide effort.
> 
> "Fortunately," he said at the time, "some newborn screening occurs in 
> every state but fewer than half of the states, including Connecticut, 
> actually tests for all disorders that are detectable. ... This 
> legislation will provide resources for states to expand their newborn 
> screening programs..."
> 
> His plan specifically would provide millions of dollars for educating 
> and training health care professionals in "relevant technologies," and 
> set up standards for updating tests and maintaining the quality of test 
> results.
> 
> So what's the big deal about looking into DNA to hunt for various 
> disease possibilities?
> 
> Nothing, said Brase, if that's where the hunt would end.
> 
> However, she said, "researchers already are looking for genes related to 
> violence, crime and different behaviors."
> 
> "This isn't just about diabetes, asthma and cancer," she said. "It's 
> also about behavioral issues."
> 
> "In England they decided they should have doctors looking for problem 
> children, and have those children reported, and their DNA taken in case 
> they would become criminals," she said.
> 
> In fact, published reports in the United Kingdom note that senior police 
> forensics experts believe genetic samples should be studied because it 
> may be possible to identify potential criminals as young as age five.
> 
> "If we have a primary means of identifying people before they offend, 
> then in the long-term the benefits of targeting younger people are 
> extremely large," Gary Pugh, director of forensics at Scotland Yard, was 
> quoted saying. "You could argue the younger the better. Criminologists 
> say some people will grow out of crime; others won't. We have to find 
> who are possibly going to be the biggest threat to society."
> 
> The United Kingdom database already has 4.5 million genetic samples and 
> reportedly is the largest in Europe, but activists want to expand it. 
> Pugh said that it is not possible right now to demand everyone provide a 
> DNA sample, but only because of the costs and logistics.
> 
> One published report cited the Institute for Public Policy Research, 
> which is suggesting children from 5-12 in the United Kingdom be targeted 
> with cognitive behavioral therapy and Pugh has suggested adding the 
> children in primary schools, even if they have not offended, to the 
> database.
> 
> There, Chris Davis of the National Primary Headteachers' Association 
> warned the move could be seen "as a step towards a police state."
> 
> But Pugh said the UK's annual cost of $26 billion from violent crime 
> makes it well worth the effort.
> 
> Brase said such efforts to study traits and gene factors and classify 
> people would be just the beginning. What could happen through subsequent 
> programs to address such conditions, she wondered.
> 
> "Not all research is great," she said. "There is research that is highly 
> objectionable into the genetic propensities of an individual. Not all 
> research should be hailed as wonderful initiatives."
> 
> It can identify some tendencies for potential problems, and that is one 
> of its downfalls, she said.
> 
> "It lends itself to be the beginning of discrimination and prejudice," 
> she said. "People can look at data about you and make assessments 
> ultimately of who you are."
> 
> Further, the invasion of privacy is huge. DNA is the most intimate 
> identifier that exists, she said.
> 
> "This, however, says our DNA is not ours but the government's," she 
> said. "It says our values, our ethics, belief systems have to be 
> [subjected] to the interests of the government."
> 
> Right now various states obtain DNA under different plans, and keep the 
> information for varying time periods. In Minnesota, the legislature is 
> working on legal authorization for the state government to take it 
> without consent, keep it forever, and use it for whatever purposes the 
> state desires -- all without obtaining consent or even letting people know.
> 
> A mandatory sample of a newborn's DNA also pulls back the veil on 
> information about the parents as well, Brase told WND.
> 
> "It's like they're collecting information on the whole family," she said.
> 
> The Heartland Regional Genetics and Newborn Screening is one of the 
> organizations that advocates for more screening and research.
> 
> It proclaims in its vision statement a desire to see newborns screened 
> for 200 conditions. It also forecasts "every student ... with an 
> individual program for education based on confidential interpretation of 
> their family medical history, their brain imaging, their genetic 
> predictors of best learning methods..."
> 
> Further, every individual should share information about "personal and 
> family health histories" as well as "gene tests for recessive conditions 
> and drug metabolism" with the "other parent of their future children."
> 
> Still further, it seeks "ecogenetic research that could improve health, 
> lessen disability, and lower costs for sickness."
> 
> "They want to test every child for 200 conditions, take the child's 
> history and a brain image, and genetics, and come up with a plan for 
> that child," Brase said. "They want to learn their weaknesses and defects.
> 
> "Nobody including and especially the government should be allowed to 
> create such extensive profiles," she said.
> 
> The next step is obvious: The government, with information about 
> potential health weaknesses, could say to couples, "We don't want your 
> expensive children," she said.
> 
> "I think people have forgotten about eugenics, the fact of the matter is 
> that the eugenicists have not gone away. Newborn genetic testing is the 
> entry into the 21st Century version of eugenics," she said.
> 
> "This is in every state, but nobody is talking about it. Parents have no 
> idea this is happening," she said.
> 
> 



      ____________________ ____________________ ____________________ ____________________ ____
You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.  
http://tc.deals.y...