Join The Ron Paul Revolution: Pittsburgh

You'll get invited to our Meetups as soon as they're scheduled!

Movie Night - Blueprint For Truth 2008 Edition

Jul 1
Wed 8:00 PM
Location
Your Inner Vagabond

4130 Butler St. at 42nd
Lawrenceville
Pittsburgh, PA 15201

This is a private home or office

How to find us
"You Know"

Estimated attendance
 3  people attended.

Who organized?
Dave Beard

After learning of the near free-fall collapses from 9/11 research veteran Dr. David Ray Griffin, architect Richard Gage, AIA, is now reaching out to the public and his peers to expose the physical evidence that has been surfacing steadily in the professional community, asking questions like, "What mechanism is required to turn 90,000 tons of concrete into powder the width of a human hair?" More than 700 architects and engineers have already joined Gage in calling for a real investigation of the THREE WTC Twin Towers that collapsed on 9/11, citing evidence of explosive controlled demolition.

Join We Are Change Pittsburgh and Patriots Question for a screening of Mr. Gage's video Blueprint For Truth - 2008 Edition, in which he presents the science-based forensic evidence for controlled demolition.

Trailer:

Photos of this Meetup

No photos yet.

Talk about this Meetup

  • Dave Beard
    Posted Jul 3, 2009 6:51 AM
    Patriots Question Discussion Group
    Law of Conservation of Momentum not conservative momentum - spelling error in last comment. Sorry i'm used to typing conservative.
  • Dave Beard
    Posted Jul 3, 2009 6:44 AM
    Patriots Question Discussion Group
    Andy we can discuss this wherever you like. You can call for your name change and all that other BS. But get to the heart of this. Give me your specifics. I will. I'll give you facts backed up by science, eyewitness reports and history. You are an engineer so I would guess you understand Newton's Law of Conservative Momentum. If you do then you'd know the collapse of the towers explanation by NIST is PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE. Please enlighten me.
  • Andy
    Posted Jul 3, 2009 12:29 AM
    Ron Paul 2008 Pittsburgh Grassroots Coordinator (volunteer)
    A better area to take this would be the discussion board. But for the name of the group, I still think it would be more truthful to change the name of this group to something more generic, like Pittsburgh Conspiracies or Re-Investigate 911 or what you call 911 Truth, as Ron Paul has clearly vocally both disagreed with your position and told the "truthers" to stop using Ron Paul to promote your rhetoric. Clearly Ron Paul, a man of his word, has stated this, many times.
  • Dave Beard
    Posted Jul 2, 2009 5:35 PM
    Patriots Question Discussion Group
    Andy give me specifics about the "questionable" material in Blueprint for Truth. No vague generalities.
  • Andy
    Posted Jul 2, 2009 7:33 AM
    Ron Paul 2008 Pittsburgh Grassroots Coordinator (volunteer)
    I think your statement on "not to push an agenda" is misleading, thus I place into question other things you state. Also as an engineer, much of that within "Blueprint For Truth" I find questionable. I'll assume you are correct in that you're "not trying to mislead anyone", but you can mislead others if the leader himself remains ignorant. Please, group leaders, change the name of this group if you intend to continue to promote issues contrary to the beliefs of Ron Paul and CFL. Thanks.
  • Andy
    Posted Jul 2, 2009 7:27 AM
    Ron Paul 2008 Pittsburgh Grassroots Coordinator (volunteer)
    "Why the Towers Fell" http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nov... http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nov... http://video.google.com/vid... http://video.google.com/vid... I don't know of one one appologist on your side who have watched this video in its entirety. Why don't you keep many copies of this video also available on your table if you weren't pushing an agenda? Be truthful, you ARE pushing an agenda.
  • Andy
    Posted Jul 2, 2009 7:13 AM
    Ron Paul 2008 Pittsburgh Grassroots Coordinator (volunteer)
    Yes, saw the video twice. I don't mind discussion. People are free to discuss anything they want. People can spend their time constructively, and people can also waste their time chasing pink bunnies. We're free to do this. I just am speaking out against a topic which Ron Paul himself also spoke out against, USING RON PAUL's NAME in promoting a topic which he himself adamently spoke out against and does not believe. If you don't want to promote an agenda, they why don't you show the other?
  • Pre-Meetup comments below
  • Dave Beard
    Posted Jul 1, 2009 6:46 PM
    Patriots Question Discussion Group
    A - These movie nights are to evoke discussion and thought not to push an agenda. I'm not trying to mislead anyone. I doubt you have actually watched this movie. If you have and you don't have at the very least some doubt that the official story is bogus then the the only one interested in fairy tales is you. I detest in-fighting but if you really feel that strongly then come to movie night tonight and we can debate it like gentlemen. I doubt you will.
  • Andy
    Posted Jun 30, 2009 5:19 PM
    Ron Paul 2008 Pittsburgh Grassroots Coordinator (volunteer)
    Saw it already. Not interested in fairy tales. Can consideration be given to changing the name of this group? This is clearly not in line with Ron Paul's beliefs. Please stop misleading others by associating Dr. Paul's name with such activity.

Who attended?